Preprints
Discover the latest research before formal peer review
Decentralized Peer Review: A Blockchain-Based Approach to Scientific Publishing
Jane Smith, John Doe, Alice Johnson, Bob Williams
Traditional scientific peer review faces challenges including reviewer bias, lack of transparency, and limited incentives for reviewers. This paper proposes a decentralized peer review system built on blockchain technology that addresses these issues. Our approach provides transparent tracking of the review process, tokenized incentives for reviewers, and immutable verification of manuscript provenance. We demonstrate a prototype implementation and evaluate its performance against traditional peer review systems. Results show improvements in review quality, reviewer participation, and overall trust in the scientific publishing process. This work contributes to the ongoing transformation of scholarly communication in the digital age.
Machine Learning Applications in Scientific Peer Review
Sarah Wilson, David Brown, Emily Chen
Traditional scientific peer review faces challenges including reviewer bias, lack of transparency, and limited incentives for reviewers. This paper proposes a decentralized peer review system built on blockchain technology that addresses these issues. Our approach provides transparent tracking of the review process, tokenized incentives for reviewers, and immutable verification of manuscript provenance. We demonstrate a prototype implementation and evaluate its performance against traditional peer review systems. Results show improvements in review quality, reviewer participation, and overall trust in the scientific publishing process. This work contributes to the ongoing transformation of scholarly communication in the digital age.
Open Science and Reproducibility in Modern Research
Michael Lee, Lisa Anderson, James Wilson
Traditional scientific peer review faces challenges including reviewer bias, lack of transparency, and limited incentives for reviewers. This paper proposes a decentralized peer review system built on blockchain technology that addresses these issues. Our approach provides transparent tracking of the review process, tokenized incentives for reviewers, and immutable verification of manuscript provenance. We demonstrate a prototype implementation and evaluate its performance against traditional peer review systems. Results show improvements in review quality, reviewer participation, and overall trust in the scientific publishing process. This work contributes to the ongoing transformation of scholarly communication in the digital age.